- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 15:33:55 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: www-archive@w3.org, Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Dan, Two small commewnts on the RDF Schema spec: > 2.3 rdfs:Literal > > .. > > rdfs:Literal is a subclass of rdfs:Resource. Is this correct? I thought rdfs:Literal was not a resource. This is also what rdfs.rdfs states. > 3.2 rdfs:domain > > [..] > > The rdfs:range of rdfs:domain is the class rdfs:Class. > This states that any resource that is the value of an > rdfs:domain property is an instance of rdfs:Class. This leaves open the possibility that rdfs;Literal (an instance of rdfs:Class) can be defined as a domain. Is this intended? Guus -- A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam, http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.html
Received on Monday, 27 January 2003 09:46:22 UTC