- From: Gerald Oskoboiny <gerald@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 13:32:42 -0700
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Cc: edd@usefulinc.com, dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk, connolly@w3.org, www-archive@w3.org
* Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> [2003-01-03 15:20-0500] > > Hi Edd, Dave, > > We're looking into making sure #rdfig discussions have an archive at > W3C. Probably the easiest thing to do is to agree a schedule for us to > grab a tar.gz from each of your sites. In theory, the chump is completely > derrivable; in practice, it'd be a pain to rebuild the site that way. Hi, pardon my butting in... I just wanted to note that grabbing regular .tar.gz's would use much more bandwidth than some other more incremental approach. It would be much more efficient (but slightly more work) to http-crawl each site and just keep a copy of everything we see, if that's ok with you. (I don't know how much more work it is; I think it's fairly easy to do stuff like this with wget, though I always need to rtfm) -- Gerald Oskoboiny http://www.w3.org/People/Gerald/ World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ tel:+1-613-261-6630 mailto:gerald@w3.org
Received on Friday, 3 January 2003 16:20:36 UTC