- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:12:27 +0100
- To: connolly@w3.org, www-archive@w3.org, em@w3.org, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, gk@ninebynine.org
- Cc: timbl@w3.org
I am drafting an agenda for the social meaning section. Where I have got to is: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2003Feb/att-0095/plenary I would welcome comments at this stage. From an agenda point of view, one of the scenarios involves a breakout group reporting back on Friday, is that OK? I hope to have frequent straw polls (say at the beginning of each issuette) in order to guide the floor control (I suspect primarily to the supporters of having any text). I would welcome Tim's presence at the meeting, since he is one of the key customers of this text. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2003 10:13:07 UTC