Re: OWL Syntax

cc www-archive rather than www-webont-wg

On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 08:09, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> Finally I have managed to (not quite) finish my work on OWL syntax ...
> 
> The entry point to a multipart document is:
> 
> http://sealpc09.cnuce.cnr.it/jeremy/owl-syntax/2003-12-Feb/intro.html
> 
> I have also copied the document to the www-archive
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2003Feb/0047.html

I skimmed them. At a glance, I don't see why I would want this
over the published AS&S design.

How about some examples to show why you think this is better?

> Sorry it took so long.
> 
> Jeremy
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 10:04:28 UTC