I don't know what to make of this, at a glance. Here's hoping one of us finds time to look at it in substance sometime soon... we have been talking about increasing the priority of work on syntax/grammar of N3. On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 07:54, Dave Beckett wrote: > As I original recorded at > http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2003/11/27/2003-11-27.html#1069935084.201348 > > @prefix : <http://example.org/base1#> . > @prefix a: <http://example.org/base2#> . > a:a a:b . > > This "triple" is passed OK by cwm. If I name the above as odd.n3 and > run it with > python2.2 cwm.py odd.n3 > I get: > > #Processed by Id: cwm.py,v 1.144 2003/09/14 20:20:20 timbl Exp > # using base file:/w3c/2000/10/swap/odd.n3 > > # Notation3 generation by > # notation3.py,v 1.147 2003/10/20 17:31:55 timbl Exp > > # Base was: file:/w3c/2000/10/swap/odd.n3 > @prefix : <http://example.org/base1#> . > @prefix a: <http://example.org/base2#> . > > a:a a :b . > > #ENDS > > > Dave -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2003 09:17:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:32:18 UTC