- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:58:12 -0500
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-archive@w3.org>
Yes, it is linked from http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/cwm.html Oh, I see you added something else too. Tim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org> To: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org> Cc: <www-archive@w3.org> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 3:34 PM Subject: seen cwmclone? > Tim, > > I missed this while we were in france... > have you seen it? > > > CWMClone in SWI-Prolog > posted by bijan at 2002-02-25 15:56 (+) > http://rdfig.xmlhack.com/2002/02/25/2002-02-25.html#1014652592.304429 > > bijan: Alpha release, temporary site ("Cool URIs may not change, but > geeky URIs change all the time!"0 > bijan: It actually reads and runs a reasonable subset of N3. I have some > confusions about []/log:forSome, built-ins aren't built, er, in yet. Nor > does it (yet) support any of cwm.py's cmd line interface. It does have a > REPL, though. A partial one, at least. > bijan: It can handle rules12.n3, which isn't too shabby. > bijan: Performance looks pretty good, thus far. Parsing is a bit slow, > and using rdf_db.pl to write each result (even when filtering) isn't > very speedy, but you can construct very fast Prolog queries against the > n3 store. > danbri_: Very cool! But have you considered rewriting this in Python? > bijan: No. > AaronSw: Sean has something similar in Python, though. > bijan: Well, GEEZ, TBL has something similar in Python too! > AaronSw: Silly bijan, his isn't a CLONE! > bijan: Annoying Aaron, the original is similar to its clones. > bijan: WOOHOO! Just got a hand-compiled, builtin-using rule to work. > bijan: Still havn't a clue about existential quantification... > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > office: tel:+1-913-491-0501 > mobile: mailto:connolly+pager@w3.org >
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 2002 11:58:06 UTC