- From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 18:55:49 -0000
- To: "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>
- Cc: "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>
Can you put an issue on the issues list for this? Thanks Gudge ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org> To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com> Cc: "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 6:11 PM Subject: Re: SOAP 1.2 Spec Issue On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Martin Gudgin wrote: > Yves, > > You and I have an action item to raise on issue regarding; > > 'Clarify the use of XML version in the envelope infoset' > > I can't remember whether this was > > 'Why do we have XML Declarations when the examples are infosets?' > > or > > 'Do we mandate XML 1.0? ( and by implication rule out XML 1.1, 2.0 etc ) > > Can you remember? Noah also points out that the examples currently use <?xml version= /> Is that part of our abstract envelope. Gudge: version is now in the infoset. Noah: do we use it in the definition of Envelope. Resolution: Yves to open an issue to cover our use of infoset for the envelope, and particularly the status of version. Examples to be made conformant. (And the AI was labelled as "Gudge & Yves" -- Yves Lafon - W3C "Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2002 13:55:06 UTC