Issues and M&S paras

Hi Graham,

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2001Jun/att-0021/00-part


Issues which are ours:
======================
rdfms-assertion
rdf-charmod-uris
rdf-namespace-change (?)
rdfms-identity-anon-resources
rdfms-graph
rdfms-literalsubjects
rdfms-uri-substructure
rdfms-xmllang
rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure
rdfms-identity-of-statements
rdf-charmod-literals

M&S section
intro:
  1, 2.1,
  para60 (deleted property namespace)
html embedding
  para75
graph:
  5
namespace
  p196 beginning
xml-literals
   p203 note
uris
  p204
literals
  para216-220
xml:lnag
  para 221

Issues which are to do with vocab:
==================================
rdfms-boolean-valued-properties
rdfms-names-use
rdfms-fragments
rdfms-replace-value

rdf;value
  2.2.3
  2.3
containers
  para 90 91
  3.5
reification
  para 135,
  4.1
reserved vocab
  para 223

acknowledgements
   8.




Issues which might be ours:
===========================
rdfms-validating-embedded-rdf (own)
rdf-equivalent-representations (not important)
appendix B transporting RDF (drop?)


Looking at schema it is very cut down and does not describe any
semantics for containers and/or reification.

Hence I suggest we should own taking the M&S text forward under issues
to do with vocab, unless the schema or series editors deem otherwise.

Jeremy

Received on Friday, 21 June 2002 11:06:33 UTC