Re: (offlist) Re: Datatyping Summary

On 2002-01-30 13:51, "ext Graham Klyne" <>

>> Is the above now clearer?
> Clearer, but I don't accept that there is no problem with self-entailment
> in TDL as currently presented.
> I think TDL possibly can be fixed (and have sent some ideas to Jememy), but
> until it is fixed it isn't in my mind a fully fledged proposal.

Fair enough.

Though I'd very much like your comments to my question in
my MT commments to Pat, that insofar as the actual denoted
values are concerned, I wonder if either TDL or S can
ensure entailment, since RDF is stuck with non-canonical
lexical forms. C.f. the last comment in


Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email:

Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2002 07:51:24 UTC