- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:24:27 -0500
- To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com, EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se, fallside@us.ibm.com, marc.hadley@sun.com, mgudgin@microsoft.com, moreau@crf.canon.fr, www-archive@w3.org
Terrific, thank you!
------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------
"Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
12/19/02 08:13 PM
To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
cc: <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>, <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>,
<fallside@us.ibm.com>, <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Martin Gudgin"
<mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, <www-archive@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Editorial comments for Part 1, section 1-3
Categories:
Noah,
I'll send it, I was just waiting for the CR issues list [1] to come up.
Stay tuned!
Henrik
[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-cr-issues
>-----Original Message-----
>From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com]
>Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 17:03
>To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
>Cc: Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com; EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se;
>fallside@us.ibm.com; marc.hadley@sun.com; Martin Gudgin;
>moreau@crf.canon.fr; www-archive@w3.org
>Subject: RE: Editorial comments for Part 1, section 1-3
>
>
>Do you want to send a note to WG or should I. I would have to
>do a bit of
>research as to exactly what our current text says, so if you happen to
>know you might just dash off a note. If I don't see you do it
>within the
>next couple of days, I'll try and get to it. Thanks.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036
>IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676
>One Rogers Street
>Cambridge, MA 02142
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>"Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
>12/18/02 10:54 PM
>
>
> To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
> cc: "Anish Karmarkar"
><Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>, "Nilo Mitra"
><EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "David Fallside"
><fallside@us.ibm.com>, "Marc
>Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Martin Gudgin"
><mgudgin@microsoft.com>,
>"Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, <www-archive@w3.org>
> Subject: RE: Editorial comments for Part 1, section 1-3
>Categories:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>OK, so ignoring for the moment any logistical issues over
>depending on
>>a CR-level namespaces draft, I think that where we say qualified name
>>we often mean expanded name. Do you agree?
>
>Yup (and logistic issues may indeed be hard to ignore)
>
>>I think this should
>>be checked
>>with the WG if we decide to make any changes, as I think it's
>>a bit beyond
>>editorial. Thanks.
>
>While it does seem editorial in nature, I agree that such
>things from now go on the issues list for WG review. In
>general, I think this applies to pretty much any change given
>where we are.
>
>Thank you,
>
>Henrik
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2002 21:27:53 UTC