- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:24:27 -0500
- To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com, EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se, fallside@us.ibm.com, marc.hadley@sun.com, mgudgin@microsoft.com, moreau@crf.canon.fr, www-archive@w3.org
Terrific, thank you! ------------------------------------------------------------------ Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 ------------------------------------------------------------------ "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com> 12/19/02 08:13 PM To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> cc: <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>, <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, <fallside@us.ibm.com>, <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, <www-archive@w3.org> Subject: RE: Editorial comments for Part 1, section 1-3 Categories: Noah, I'll send it, I was just waiting for the CR issues list [1] to come up. Stay tuned! Henrik [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-cr-issues >-----Original Message----- >From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] >Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 17:03 >To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen >Cc: Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com; EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se; >fallside@us.ibm.com; marc.hadley@sun.com; Martin Gudgin; >moreau@crf.canon.fr; www-archive@w3.org >Subject: RE: Editorial comments for Part 1, section 1-3 > > >Do you want to send a note to WG or should I. I would have to >do a bit of >research as to exactly what our current text says, so if you happen to >know you might just dash off a note. If I don't see you do it >within the >next couple of days, I'll try and get to it. Thanks. > >------------------------------------------------------------------ >Noah Mendelsohn Voice: 1-617-693-4036 >IBM Corporation Fax: 1-617-693-8676 >One Rogers Street >Cambridge, MA 02142 >------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > >"Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com> >12/18/02 10:54 PM > > > To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> > cc: "Anish Karmarkar" ><Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>, "Nilo Mitra" ><EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "David Fallside" ><fallside@us.ibm.com>, "Marc >Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Martin Gudgin" ><mgudgin@microsoft.com>, >"Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, <www-archive@w3.org> > Subject: RE: Editorial comments for Part 1, section 1-3 >Categories: > > > > > > >>OK, so ignoring for the moment any logistical issues over >depending on >>a CR-level namespaces draft, I think that where we say qualified name >>we often mean expanded name. Do you agree? > >Yup (and logistic issues may indeed be hard to ignore) > >>I think this should >>be checked >>with the WG if we decide to make any changes, as I think it's >>a bit beyond >>editorial. Thanks. > >While it does seem editorial in nature, I agree that such >things from now go on the issues list for WG review. In >general, I think this applies to pretty much any change given >where we are. > >Thank you, > >Henrik > > > >
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2002 21:27:53 UTC