- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 22:35:19 -0800
- To: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>
- Cc: "Anish Karmarkar" <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>, "David Fallside" <fallside@us.ibm.com>, <www-archive@w3.org>
Status: All done except question pending mail >>General Comments >>---------------- >> >>* We are inconsistent in the use of the term "SOAP message >>infoset". Variants include >> >>- SOAP message infoset >>- SOAP Message Infoset >>- SOAP envelope infosets >>- SOAP XML Infoset >>- Envelope XML infosets >> >>I would recommend: "SOAP message infoset" > >Just do it Done >>* We are inconsistent in the use of the term "infoset" in >>places not covered by the above. Variants include >> >>- Infoset >>- infoset >>- XML Infoset >>- XML infoset >> >>I would recommend: "XML infoset" Done >Just do it > >>* I assume the new namespace will be >> >> http://www.w3.org/2002/12/* > >Update after we move the spec into new location Pending >>Specific Comments >>----------------- >> >>* S5.2.1, bullet 4: Add bullet for "relay" attribute information item > >Same as Gudge's point. Just do it. Done >>* S5.2.4, 3 (just after bullet list): xs:boolean should be >>marked (italic) > >Just do it Done >>* S5.3 bullet list: Is it intentional that Body can't contain >>any character II children even if header blocks and fault detail can? > >Ask the WG. Should detail and body be the same? Ok that header >block is different. Henrik to send mail. Pending mail >>* S5.3.1, bullet 1: Why do we have a namespace note on the >>body child elements descendents but not on header block >>descendents? Also, the former says "MAY" namespace qualify >>whereas the latter says "SHOULD". Shouldn't we be consistent? > >It's ok as is. Ok >>* S5.4, P2 (just after bullet list): Change "only child of the >>SOAP Body" with "only child of the SOAP Body element information item" > >It should say only child element II of the body EII Done >>* 5.4.7.2, P1: Change "TheSupportedEnvelope" to "The >SupportedEnvelope" > >Just do it. Done Henrik Frystyk Nielsen mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 2002 01:35:52 UTC