- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 15:07:52 -0800
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Overall status: all done except 8 and 9. >1. Section 1 > > The language we use for bullet 4 doesn't match the other bullets Match is now slightly better >2. Section 2.1 > > "this, if any" should read "thus, if any" Already done >3. Section 3.1.1 > > We should put a cross-ref to Part 1 at the end of >numbered bullet 2. done >4. Section 3.1.6 > > "considered to be of unspecified size" should read >"considered to have a single dimension of unspecified size" done >5. Section 3.1.7 > > For consistency we should say the type is enc:valueType done >6. Section 4 > > We should drop "only" from "not limited only to the >SOAP HTTP Binding" done >7. Section 4.2.2 > > First bullet should be removed ( left over text ) Alredy done >8. Section 4.2.2 > > The numbered bullets use the term 'terminal node', but >that term no longer exists in the data model. We should >rewrite in terms of nodes with a lexical value. NOT DONE >9. Section 4.4 > > The language in the numbered bullets doesn't seem >consistent with other language concerning infoset items NOT DONE >10. Section 5.1.1 > > First bullet has an example which is a QName ( should be a URI ) Already fixed (example removed) >11. Section 5.1.2 > > Diagram. Should the cloud with "Net" in it read "Network"? I can live with "Net" but not a biggie Henrik
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2002 18:08:57 UTC