- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 11:07:20 -0800
- To: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Cc: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
But of course ;-) Gudge > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Hadley [mailto:marc.hadley@sun.com] > Sent: 04 December 2002 11:05 > To: Martin Gudgin > Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; W3C Public Archive; Jean-Jacques > Moreau; Nilo Mitra; Noah Mendelson > Subject: Re: Some editorial tweaks > > > On Wednesday, Dec 4, 2002, at 13:48 US/Eastern, Martin Gudgin wrote: > > > Yes, but that should be the last thing we do. And any other changes > > should be in the change log. I would expect that in CVS we have a > > document with the diff markup removed but a complete change log in > > place. And then remove the change log and check in that version. > > > With the diff markup removed from the change log ? ;-) > > Marc. > > > Gudge > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Marc Hadley [mailto:marc.hadley@sun.com] > >> Sent: 04 December 2002 10:47 > >> To: Martin Gudgin > >> Cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen; W3C Public Archive; > Jean-Jacques Moreau; > >> Nilo Mitra; Noah Mendelson > >> Subject: Re: Some editorial tweaks > >> > >> > >> Aren't we going to remove the change log as part of > removing the diff > >> markup ? > >> > >> Marc. > >> > >> On Wednesday, Dec 4, 2002, at 13:30 US/Eastern, Martin > Gudgin wrote: > >> > >>> We should definitely put them in the change log. > >>> > >>> I take it you meant to say 'ask the WG for license to fix' > >> rather than > >>> 'ask the WG to fix' > >>> > >>> Gudge > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen > >>>> Sent: 04 December 2002 10:25 > >>>> To: Martin Gudgin; W3C Public Archive; Jean-Jacques Moreau; Marc > >>>> Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah Mendelson > >>>> Subject: RE: Some editorial tweaks > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> These seem find to me. What I would suggest is that we as > >> part of the > >>>> plan for the next week ask the WG to fix editorial > inconsistencies > >>>> given the changes that has been made to the spec during > >> last call as > >>>> long as we document them in a change log. > >>>> > >>>> Does this make sense? > >>>> > >>>> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen > >>>> mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com > >>>> > >>>>> I read through Part 1 last night and noted that there > are several > >>>>> things that need editorial attention/clarification. Here > >> is a list > >>>>> of the things I noted, in the order they appear in the > >> spec. BTW - > >>>>> I'm happy to make all these changes sometime before close of > >>>>> business Monday. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> -- > >> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> > >> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems. > >> > >> > > > > > -- > Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> > Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems. > >
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 14:07:52 UTC