W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > August 2002

RE: Edtodo is now uptodate

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 18:02:54 -0700
Message-ID: <92456F6B84D1324C943905BEEAE0278E02681C92@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen 
> Sent: 25 August 2002 05:18
> To: 'Jean-Jacques Moreau'; Martin Gudgin
> Cc: 'W3C Public Archive'; 'Marc Hadley'; 'Nilo Mitra'; 'Noah 
> Mendelson'
> Subject: RE: Edtodo is now uptodate
> >> 352d: Ensure all occurences of Infoset properties appear in square
> >> brackets; e.g. '[specified]' rather than 'specified'.
> >>
> >The better long term solution would be to create and use a new
> >XML element. We should then s/[/<prop>/.
> Hmm, now they look like [references]--I think I would prefer 
> some other stylistic solution.

They have always looked like references. All  I've done is go through
and put [] around some instances of Infoset properties that did not have
them ( mainly in Part 2 ) . The reason they look like references is
because that is the style the Infoset spec[1] uses.



[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/
Received on Sunday, 25 August 2002 21:03:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:31:52 UTC