W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > August 2002

Re: Edtodo is now uptodate

From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:24:42 -0400
Cc: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Message-Id: <47EFD1C8-B5E3-11D6-9B39-0003937568DC@sun.com>

On Thursday, August 22, 2002, at 10:40 AM, Martin Gudgin wrote:
>>> 289: What does an intermediary do when it receives a fault? Is the
>>> fault guaranteed to be passed on to the original sender (
>> or previous
>>> intermediary)?
>> Since we don't indicate what happens when faults are
>> generated in the first place, I think the most we can say is
>> that intermediaries MAY forward fault messages.
>> However, I am wondering whether this is not raising a deeper
>> issue, which is how intermediaries forward response messages.
>> I think sections 2.7.* are written from the POV of request
>> messages; do they cover adequately response messages?
> Good question. What do the other editors think?
Note also that a previous draft[1] had more to say on this. Not 
sure why or when this was removed.


[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-soap12-part2-20011217/#ND5B

Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
XML Technology Center, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Thursday, 22 August 2002 11:24:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:31:52 UTC