- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2001 08:58:13 -0500
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- CC: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>, hugo@w3.org, em@w3.org, www-archive@w3.org
Dan Brickley wrote: [...] > todo: > - need a Perl ntriples parser (Dan, did you write one of these?) yes; these might be a bit out of date by now, but they parse something pretty close to n-triples: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/n3-simple.pl http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/n-triples2kif.pl Neither of the above does string un-quoting. I think the one that spits out KIF is more current w.r.t. whitespace and comments. [...] > I'm thinking that if we can avoid RDFisms in our representation of SOAP > data, we might get away with persuading them to adopt NTriples as a > testing format... > > What do you reckon? Interesting tactic! > Anyway work so far (inc. a .png for 1st two tests; 2nd is prettier) is all > at > http://www.w3.org/2001/09/soap-ntriples/ > > I figure there are three reasons at least why this is interesting: > > - SOAP conformance testing > - visualisation of SOAP data structures > - RDF/SOAP interoperability > > Dan -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ office: tel:+1-913-491-0501 mobile: mailto:connolly+pager@w3.org?subject=pls%20call%20+1-...
Received on Saturday, 8 September 2001 09:58:15 UTC