- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 13:38:07 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com>
- Cc: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>, <www-archive@w3.org>, "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
Murray Altheim <altheim@eng.sun.com> wrote: > HTML 2.0 used NAMES for %linkType;, > which is even more restrictive than NMTOKENS. HTML 3.2 described > link types still as tokens. The most that has been written on the > subject that I'm aware of is the IETF draft by Murray Maloney and > Liam Quin (draft-ietf-html-relrev-00.txt), which again uses name > tokens as examples. If HTML 4 had intended to include URIs as 'rel' > and 'rev' values, it would have specified the parameter entity > differently or mentioned this possibility in the specification. Thank you for clearing up the history of this. I was unaware of this information and that led to my confusion. Many thanks. -- [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Friday, 27 April 2001 14:08:38 UTC