- From: Urs Holzer <urs@andonyar.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:25:45 +0200
- To: Stephen Crawley <uqscrawl@uq.edu.au>
- Cc: Matthew Wilson <matthew@mjwilson.demon.co.uk>, www-annotation@w3.org
Stephen Crawley wrote: > So I think the most practical solution would be to set up an informal > working group (independent of W3C) to come up with consensus answers > and document them. A Wiki-based group sounds a reasonable approach. > (We might be able to host an Annotea Wiki on "http://metadata.net" > ... I need to check out some issues.) That would be great, Stephen. > It remains to be seen if there are enough interested people with the > skills and dedication to come up with a decent Annotea specification. > In my experience (MOF, XMI), writing a decent specification / > standard is hard work, and requires real dedication, discipline and > willingness to compromise. So lets not get too ambitious just yet. Well, we can start and see what happens. On the other side, I don't like the idea of some of us dedicating much time for nothing. If it is a small amount of work to set up a Wiki, we should do that and use it to check whether it is worth to start work on a specification.
Received on Monday, 6 July 2009 11:26:29 UTC