Re: Annotea's context property

Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Mercoledì, 5 Mar 2003, alle 21:01 Europe/Paris, Brent Hendricks ha scritto:
> 
>> For my future reference, how do you determine whether something is a 
>> resource or a literal from the schema?
>> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns defines 'context' (a literal) 
>> and 'annotates' (a resource), as:

[snip]

> The one with  "<rdfs:range rdf:resource="#Literal"/>" is a literal ;-)

So that would be none of them.  I'm now thoroughly confused. :)

> I'm wondering, why does zAnnot care about, isn't it a good idea for a 
> server to return what it gets. Does zAnnot allow the author attribute to 
> be both a Resource (VCARD or so) as well as a Literal, or does zAnnot 
> insist on getting what it expects?

ZAnnot attempts to follow the Annotea spec as written.  There, creator 
appears as a literal.  I can try to be a little more flexible in what I 
accept, but I'm concerned about interoperability.  If each client is 
basically choosing what type of data to send for each field, how will 
they ever be compatible?

--Brent

> reto
> 
> PS: is there a public zAnnot server against which I can test my client?

Sure.  http://thehendricks.org:8080/annotations

Username: guest
Password: annotations

It's running ZAnnot 0.4rc1 that I just released yesterday


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (Darwin)
> 
> iD8DBQE+ZwSoD1pReGFYfq4RAu0NAKCaWLEoa8eG+aMtBfA/CrvNZLRadACfa3Vd
> aO2bmq/aOSOEVWJoFpf3o5g=
> =yD0h
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Thursday, 6 March 2003 11:12:18 UTC