- From: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto@gmuer.ch>
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:42:37 +0100
- To: Brent Hendricks <brentmh@ece.rice.edu>
- Cc: www-annotation@w3.org, Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>, jose.kahan@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mercoledì, 5 Mar 2003, alle 21:01 Europe/Paris, Brent Hendricks ha scritto: > For my future reference, how do you determine whether something is a > resource or a literal from the schema? > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns defines 'context' (a literal) > and 'annotates' (a resource), as: > > <rdf:Property > rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns#context"> > <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">context</rdfs:label> > <rdfs:comment>The context within the resource named in 'annotates' > to which the Annotation most directly applies.</rdfs:comment> > <rdfs:isDefinedBy > rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns#"/> > </rdf:Property> > > <rdf:Property > rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns#annotates"> > <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">annotates</rdfs:label> > <rdfs:comment>Relates an Annotation to the resource to which the > Annotation applies. The inverse relation is > 'hasAnnotation'</rdfs:comment> > <rdfs:isDefinedBy > rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns#"/> > </rdf:Property> > > To me these look pretty much the same. Am I missing something? The one with "<rdfs:range rdf:resource="#Literal"/>" is a literal ;-) I'm wondering, why does zAnnot care about, isn't it a good idea for a server to return what it gets. Does zAnnot allow the author attribute to be both a Resource (VCARD or so) as well as a Literal, or does zAnnot insist on getting what it expects? reto PS: is there a public zAnnot server against which I can test my client? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (Darwin) iD8DBQE+ZwSoD1pReGFYfq4RAu0NAKCaWLEoa8eG+aMtBfA/CrvNZLRadACfa3Vd aO2bmq/aOSOEVWJoFpf3o5g= =yD0h -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:42:42 UTC