- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:52:24 -0000
- To: www-annotation@w3.org
"Daniel Eschle" <d.eschle@web.de> wrote in message news:b19ior$o1p$1@main.gmane.org... > Am I right, that on the other side it's also possible that the Annotation > itself may be something different than a XHTML document, e.g. an audio > file? Yes, I already send a few annotations of images to an annotea service where the body isn't a html document, but another RDF document (I keep the bodies seperate) at the moment I just say the context is the whole image (the seperate RDF doc provides more context info) but yes you could provide any type, my snufkin interface is also happy with other types providing a link to the Annotation if it's not a type it can render. Jim.
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2003 11:43:14 UTC