- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 21:26:12 -0500 (EST)
- To: <www-annotation@w3.org>
Hi all, in the protocol document [1] all the examples for context use a literal as its value. The schema doesn't specify any domain or range. In my annotools I used an rdf:resource as the object, on the basis that it was going to be an Xpointer or a URI. The ZAnnot server is returning this as if it were a literal. Is there a reason why the object should be one or the other? Does the specification remain purposely silent on the question, or are the examples reflective of the assumed use. And what do implementations expect? A related question is how this applies to the Annotates property - what happens if I use an rdf:Bag for the things that a particular annotation annotates? cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles tel: +61 409 134 136 SWAD-E http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe fax(france): +33 4 92 38 78 22 Post: 21 Mitchell street, FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia or W3C, 2004 Route des Lucioles, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Sunday, 26 January 2003 21:26:12 UTC