Confusion over RDF for annotation type

• From: Matthew Wilson <matthew@mjwilson.demon.co.uk>
• Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 17:54:58 +0100
• To: www-annotation@w3.org
• Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.1.20021017175135.00b94cf0@pop3.demon.co.uk>

In this message:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-annotation/2002JulDec/0000.html

it seemed that there was confusion over the correct way to indicate the 
type of an annotation.

Jim Ley thought that annotations should have an rdf:type of a:Annotation 
and could optionally have an a:annotationType which described the 
annotation type in more detail.

But the protocol page indicates that there can be two different rdf:type's.

Can anyone clarify this?

Matthew Wilson

Received on Thursday, 17 October 2002 13:43:54 UTC