- From: Gary Trujillo <amaya@btlonline.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:34:43 -0500
- To: Amaya Mailing List <www-amaya@w3.org>
OK. I've fixed the page back to the way it was yesterday, before the SSI include files got messed with by someone who will remain anonymous. :-) I've also isolated my files from the main site ones to prevent such a thing from happening again. So, once again, I ask, what's wrong with the page at: http://btlonline.org/2010/101126-btl-gst.html or could there be a problem in how Amaya is rendering the page? The W3C and WDG validators both now give it a pass. And again, the problem is illustrated on the screenshots page at: http://btlonline.org/demo/101122-amaya_display.html Thanks to Peter and to anyone else who might have time to take a look. Gary On 11/23/2010 3:29 PM, Gary Trujillo wrote: > On 11/23/2010 3:23 PM, Peter Kerr wrote: >> The Philosopher's Stone of web markup is believed by many >> to be http://www.w3.org/QA/Tools/#validators >> in particular http://validator.w3.org/ >> >> which shows 51 errors on >> http://btlonline.org/2010/101126-btl-gst.html... > > Someone else on my team must have messed with one or more of the SSI > include files, then. Before I posted my article, I made sure that > there were > no validation errors - using both the W3C and WDG validators. I'll check > out the situation, fix the errors, and then post an "all clear." In > any event, > I'm sure the problem is not due to problems with the HTML itself, but I > admit it's difficult to prove when there remain errors in the code. > > brb... :-) >
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2010 21:35:35 UTC