- From: Keith Hopper <kh@waikato.ac.nz>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 15:36:11 +1200
- To: www-amaya@w3.org
In article <Pine.LNX.4.30.0209231751420.25011-100000@tux.w3.org>, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org> wrote: > So I tried to reproduce this (Amaya 6.1). It doesn't work with XHTML, only > with HTML, as far as I can figure. > What happens is that it is possible to introduce strange things into the > source of HTML, and Amaya corrects the markup when synchronising. > Does this match what you were doing? (And do you have a sample file or more > details?) > cheers > Chaals > On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Janet Daly wrote: > >So here's the rub (x2) > > > >Did that (syncing) and still have the problem. Also, saving other docs > >after browsing with regular view does not alert me to bad markup. > > > >Janet I don't know whether the interesting problems I have been having with documents originated elsewhere - for revision to current standards. The document I have been playing with is at http://www.microdigital.co.uk/newsdesk/September02/thur19.htm which claims to be HTML 3.2 - but isn't. I loaded into Amaya 6.4 (linux GTK version) and tried some simple editing - but Amaya kept indicating that anywhere I wished to select was - Graphics\area\map\td\tr\tbody\table\center\body\html\Document and would not let me select it. I thought to try and save it locally which Amaya did - but didn't raise a protest either then or on an attempt to reload it - that is all I can do apart from viewing many red marks on the structure view and several lines in the parsing errors. Might this be a related problem?? Keith Hopper -- Keith Hopper Senior Lecturer Department of Computer Science University of Waikato, NZ
Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 23:36:38 UTC