- From: Keith Hopper <kh@waikato.ac.nz>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 15:36:11 +1200
- To: www-amaya@w3.org
In article <Pine.LNX.4.30.0209231751420.25011-100000@tux.w3.org>,
Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org> wrote:
> So I tried to reproduce this (Amaya 6.1). It doesn't work with XHTML, only
> with HTML, as far as I can figure.
> What happens is that it is possible to introduce strange things into the
> source of HTML, and Amaya corrects the markup when synchronising.
> Does this match what you were doing? (And do you have a sample file or more
> details?)
> cheers
> Chaals
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Janet Daly wrote:
> >So here's the rub (x2)
> >
> >Did that (syncing) and still have the problem. Also, saving other docs
> >after browsing with regular view does not alert me to bad markup.
> >
> >Janet
I don't know whether the interesting problems I have been having with
documents originated elsewhere - for revision to current standards.
The document I have been playing with is at
http://www.microdigital.co.uk/newsdesk/September02/thur19.htm
which claims to be HTML 3.2 - but isn't. I loaded into Amaya 6.4 (linux
GTK version) and tried some simple editing - but Amaya kept indicating that
anywhere I wished to select was -
Graphics\area\map\td\tr\tbody\table\center\body\html\Document
and would not let me select it. I thought to try and save it locally which
Amaya did - but didn't raise a protest either then or on an attempt to
reload it - that is all I can do apart from viewing many red marks on the
structure view and several lines in the parsing errors. Might this be a
related problem??
Keith Hopper
--
Keith Hopper
Senior Lecturer
Department of Computer Science
University of Waikato, NZ
Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 23:36:38 UTC