- From: Vincent Quint <Vincent.Quint@inrialpes.fr>
- Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 14:12:04 +0100
- To: "Rzepa, Henry" <h.rzepa@ic.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-amaya@w3.org
Henry, Thanks for pointing this out. There was a bug in the evaluation of nested objects in Amaya. It is fixed in the CVS base. Vincent. Henry Rzepa wrote: > > Some two years ago we wrote a simple page to test <object> handling. > We were anticipating generating XHTML display code from XSLT > transform of XML content, and wanted to make the result as robust as > possible. > > http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/chemime/tests/object/browsers/scheme2.html > > was tested against the then range of browsers, with pretty disappointing > results. Only one browser (iCab) passed the tests. Revisiting this test > some 20 months on, I found things certainly improving. Thus Netscape 6 > is pretty good, and now matches iCab. > > Assuming however that Amaya is the gold standard, > I expected the result > > http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/chemime/tests/object/browsers/mozilla_x.jpg > > (actually from Mozilla on MacOS X, for which neither plugins nor > Java are currently enabled; a situation which I presumed matches > Amaya precisely). > > In fact, the latest Amaya does not perform as I had expected > (try for yourselves)., attempting to display the plugin and Java, > even though it cannot do either. > > Can anyone comment on whether in fact our code is wrong, > whether there is a genuine bug in Amaya, or whether the interpretation > is ambiguous? > > -- > > Henry Rzepa. > +44 (0870) 132 3747 (eFax) Mobile +44 0778 6268 220 > http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/ Dept. Chemistry, Imperial College, London, SW7 2AY, UK.
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2002 08:12:23 UTC