- From: <brantgurganus2001@cherokeescouting.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:52:51 -0500
- To: s.budd@ic.ac.uk
- Cc: www-amaya@w3.org
Mozilla has SVG support. For more information, see their SVG project at http://www.mozilla.org/projects/svg. ----- Original Message ----- From: Budd, Sinclair <s.budd@ic.ac.uk> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 4:36:55 PM To: <www-amaya@w3.org> Subject: FW: inline svg problem > Are there any viewers that can display such a file besides amaya? Neither > Mozilla 0.99 or IE 5.5 can! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Irene Vatton [mailto:Irene.Vatton@inrialpes.fr] > Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:12 AM > To: John Ellson > Cc: www-amaya-dev@w3.org; www-amaya@w3.org > Subject: Re: inline svg problem > > > > Not sure if this is the right place for Amaya bugs? The Amaya help menu > doesn't tell me where to go. > > www-amaya@w3.org is the right place. > > > > > Using Amaya from CVS today.. > > > > > > I have an html page with inline SVG at: > > > > http://www.graphviz.org/cgi-bin/webdot/webdot/svginline.html > > > > > > The bug is that just under the diagram there is a line with "]>" on it. > > I'm not sure if this is my bug, or Amaya's, but I'm hoping that someone > > here can tell me? > > In fact your document is not correct and the Amaya html parser is too > tolerant > here. > You cannot include a complete xml document within a html document. > The main document should be an xhtml document and you should use the > namespaces > technology to include SVG within. > The xml declaration can appear only at the beginning of the document. > See http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/conform.html which explains how to include > SVG fragments. > > > > > The characters come from the end of the preamble to the inline SVG in the > middle of the html: > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> > > <!DOCTYPE svg PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD SVG 1.0//EN" > > "http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-SVG-20010904/DTD/svg10.dtd" [ > > <!ATTLIST svg xmlns:xlink CDATA #FIXED "http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> > > ]> > > > > Shouldn't this entire <!DOCTYPE....> block be ignored for layout? > > > > > > John Ellson > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2002 13:53:04 UTC