- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2001 00:57:41 -0500 (EST)
- To: Amaya List <www-amaya@w3.org>
Hi, I have a bug arise when I copy images as follows: Open a page which referes to images that are elsewhere. For example, has an image <img src="../../../foo/bar/image" alt="smiley" /> Copy the image, and paste it into a new document which has a different path to the old one. The image appears, but on saving the document and reloading it the image is gone. It seems that when the image is copied, the source link is always copied as is, and isn't transformed. In general I think this is wrong - if the source isn't transformed and there isn't that image at the same relative path then nothing should appear, but that is counter-intuitive. It would make more sense for the image src attribute to be transformed in the copying process. I am not sure if there is a reason to have the existing functionality still available, although I suspect there might be. A similar question can arise when copying links that have relative hrefs and are going to pages that have different paths. cheers Charles McCN -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Saturday, 8 December 2001 00:57:41 UTC