- From: Dave J Woolley <david.woolley@bts.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:48:05 +0100
- To: "'www-amaya@w3.org'" <www-amaya@w3.org>
> From: Charles McCathieNevile [SMTP:charles@w3.org] > > dt {display: block ; font-weight: bold } > dd {display: inline } [DJW:] I would say that dt should be display: compact and dd should be display: block, although I don't know how well compact is supported. I think I got a test case to work on IE5 once, but I'm not sure. > On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Scott Davis wrote: > > As I understand it, this is the sort of thing that <DIR> and <MENU> were > supposed to assist. [DJW:] DL was intended for this, and I seem to remember that some early browsers actually implemented it that way. I was one of the early casualties to popularisation and presentationalising of HTML. I never really understood why the it wasn't implemneted like this, although a realisation that the market was not interested in structure may have mean that designing code to support it was too low a priority activity. I think DIR was intended for the sort of multi-column directory listing that you get with an MS-DOS dir command or Unix ls -C (some don't need the -C). I'm not so sure about MENU, but I think a good way to format it would have been like the very first presentational pseudo list form in HTML: [ option 1 | option 2 | option 3 ], but it's too late now. -- --------------------------- DISCLAIMER --------------------------------- Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2001 06:48:42 UTC