- From: Dave J Woolley <david.woolley@bts.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:48:05 +0100
- To: "'www-amaya@w3.org'" <www-amaya@w3.org>
> From: Charles McCathieNevile [SMTP:charles@w3.org]
>
> dt {display: block ; font-weight: bold }
> dd {display: inline }
[DJW:]
I would say that dt should be display: compact and dd
should be display: block, although I don't know how
well compact is supported. I think I got a test case to
work on IE5 once, but I'm not sure.
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Scott Davis wrote:
>
> As I understand it, this is the sort of thing that <DIR> and <MENU> were
> supposed to assist.
[DJW:]
DL was intended for this, and I seem to remember that some
early browsers actually implemented it that way. I was one
of the early casualties to popularisation and presentationalising
of HTML.
I never really understood why the it wasn't implemneted like this,
although a realisation that the market was not interested in
structure
may have mean that designing code to support it was too low a
priority
activity.
I think DIR was intended for the sort of multi-column directory
listing that you get with an MS-DOS dir command or Unix ls -C (some
don't need the -C).
I'm not so sure about MENU, but I think a good way to format it
would have been like the very first presentational pseudo list form
in HTML: [ option 1 | option 2 | option 3 ], but it's too late
now.
--
--------------------------- DISCLAIMER ---------------------------------
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of BTS.
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2001 06:48:42 UTC