As I was in the To: line, I'll say I'd be happy with either. :-) Source would be easier to produce though, I bet. Hugh On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > Daniel, > > are you talking about a source tarball or a full compiled version? > > Charles > > On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > > So technically generating a tar file from a CVS checkout on a regular > > basis isn't hard, but making sure taht this checkout is useful is. Would > > you candidate to report problems if I generate such a periodic checkout ? > > Problems with the checkout, or with the release? I can't promise to > do it every time, but I will be happy to look at this more frequently > than I do at present. > > > > > Daniel > > > Hugh > hgs@dmu.ac.uk > > > > >Received on Monday, 13 March 2000 12:29:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:30:30 UTC