- From: Etienne Baranshamaje <Etienne@komera.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 07:40:37 -0400
- To: ptrourke@mediaone.net, www-amaya@w3.org
- Message-id: 20000507074037-Etienne@komera.com
The idea of an editor browser is a very powerful one indeed. When full implemented, it could hopefully enable to regain independance from bloated desktop applications such as word and wordperfect. This could happen very rapidly the Amaya folks could announce loud and clear that the browser can do other things such as presentation and spreed sheet. Then the psychological barriers that tie people to the desktop will pretty much vanish, for in reality, the majority of users need only an editor but always look for things that they will never use and don't know how to use them. I found browsing with Amaya a bit confusing in the sense that every familiar click -in the IE/Netscape world- I made almost ended being interpreted as an edit command. I must admit that I have not invested enough time though to know the ins and out of Amaya to avoid those pitfalls. Etienne ===================== Etienne Baranshamaje Komera Corp. 301-9513441 http://www.komera.com ========= ========= ========= ========= ========= [Re: Amaya handling of Java script] P. T. Rourke <ptrourke@mediaone.net> wrote on Sat, 6 May 2000 22:18:08 -0400 Well, if the Amaya team intended Amaya to be a full-feature browser, this would make sense. At this time, though, they seem to be focusing on the editing features, so that Amaya is very useful for browsing Amaya pages, but less so for browsing non-Amaya pages (almost all of which violate some part of the spec). But it does serve another, higher purpose: spreading the word about the idea of the editor/browser, which I wish the Mozilla and IE folks would heed. Patrick Rourke Massachusetts (no affiliation with W3C) > Is there any plan to make it handle javascript, and if so, what is the > timeframe? Clearly, if this is to become a browser that is commonly used, and > it should, then this problem, while minor is worth addressing. > Etienne
Received on Sunday, 7 May 2000 07:39:11 UTC