- From: <jose.kahan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 06:30:00 -0400 (EDT)
- To: beerse@ats.nld.alcatel.nl (Corne Beerse)
- Cc: tmollica@thegrid.net, www-amaya@w3.org
Corne, Thanks for your remarks. I changed the names of the obtuse configuration rules to something more friendly. When the minor release is out, take a look at the Configurating file from the on-line menu to see the new names. I'll also send a dedicated mail to the list after the release. In our previous episode, Corne Beerse said: > > If you change the rule, please only use positive rules: Make it > something like REREADCHECK or PUT_CHECK and not disable_.... or > no_....!!! This avoids problems for peoples who don't read english verry > well. Specially the no_... version is often misunderstood as the > NumberOf_...... I would have the NO_REREAD_CHECK given a number value: 0 > for none and 2 for twice!. > > So for this (new) rule: > PUT_CHECK=true > -Jose
Received on Friday, 9 October 1998 06:37:21 UTC