- From: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 22:45:52 +0000
- To: Matt King <a11ythinker@gmail.com>, 'Joseph Scheuhammer' <clown@alum.mit.edu>, 'Alexander Surkov' <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
- CC: 'James Teh' <jamie@nvaccess.org>, 'Richard Schwerdtfeger' <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>, "public-aria@w3.org" <public-aria@w3.org>
Yes, that is correct. -----Original Message----- From: Matt King [mailto:a11ythinker@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 4:55 PM To: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>; 'Joseph Scheuhammer' <clown@alum.mit.edu>; 'Alexander Surkov' <surkov.alexander@gmail.com> Cc: 'James Teh' <jamie@nvaccess.org>; 'Richard Schwerdtfeger' <schwer@us.ibm.com>; wai-xtech@w3.org; public-aria@w3.org Subject: RE: role="text" and text frames Cynthia, if that is how it would work, does that mean that it would be literally impossible for the screen reader user to be aware of the image? Like, for example, there would not be any way for the screen reader to provide an option to ignore the text role? Would the image context menu be out of reach? Matt -----Original Message----- From: Cynthia Shelly [mailto:cyns@microsoft.com] Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 2:10 PM To: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>; Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com> Cc: James Teh <jamie@nvaccess.org>; Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>; wai-xtech@w3.org; public-aria@w3.org Subject: RE: role="text" and text frames Yes, that's correct. Again, I'm really not sure this is needed. I think leaving the image role alone would create as good a user experience in this case. -----Original Message----- From: Joseph Scheuhammer [mailto:clown@alum.mit.edu] Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 10:08 AM To: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>; Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com> Cc: James Teh <jamie@nvaccess.org>; Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>; wai-xtech@w3.org; public-aria@w3.org Subject: Re: role="text" and text frames Hi Cynthia, Thanks for the detailed response; it helps me wrap my head around how UIA works in this case. I have one question regarding case 4: On 2016-02-04 4:42 PM, Cynthia Shelly wrote: > > 4)Once upon a <img alt=”foo” role=”text”> time > > Page text pattern is “Once upon a foo time” > > Accessible tree is > > Page > The accessible name computation is run on the <img> element to get "foo". But, in this case, you do not assign an accessible name property to any accessible, since there is no accessible for the <img> element. Instead, the string "foo" is inserted into the page text pattern at the point where the img accessible would have been, had there been one. Is that correct? -- ;;;;joseph. 'Die Wahrheit ist Irgendwo da Draußen. Wieder.' - C. Carter -
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2016 22:46:33 UTC