- From: Jason Kiss <jason@accessibleculture.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:43:45 +1200
- To: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
- Cc: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>, Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>, "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACFCJLQoGeXoJ0pvceQKwmy-u9x=sB6c6ifkEvpVG1+i3m-b_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Ok. So, to confirm, we can delete the MSAA + UIA Express column, and move the MSAA role to the MSAA + IA2 column, so that for something like the <abbr> element, we'd have the following: MSAA Role: ROLE_SYSTEM_TEXT IA2 Role: IA2_ROLE_TEXT_FRAME Object attributes: "abbr" attribute on the containing td <https://rawgit.com/w3c/aria/master/html-aam/html-aam.html#el-td> if a single child, text content used as a value Interfaces: IAccessibleText2; IAccessibleHypertext2; Or is it clear enough from the role names which API they belong to such that we could include them together? For example, Roles: ROLE_SYSTEM_TEXT; IA2_ROLE_TEXT_FRAME Any preference? Jason On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 5:13 AM, Alexander Surkov < surkov.alexander@gmail.com> wrote: > You know, we can move MSAA roles to MSAA + IA2 column instead, then UIA > patterns will be matched by UIA column. Do we have anything left? > Thanks. > Alexander. > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Jason Kiss <jason@accessibleculture.org> > wrote: >> >> I also prefer the idea of adding notes to the UIA column. >> >> Alex, wrt the HTML-AAM, can you give me an impression of what from the >> existing MSAA + UIA Express column needs to be added as a note to the UIA >> column, for which elements and properties? Once that’s done, we can get rid >> of the MSAA + UIA Express column. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jason >> >> >> On 11/08/2016, at 7:43 AM, Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, Cynthia. Sorry for my late reply. If you're still looking for my >> input, then notes in UIA column should work well. >> Alex. >> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Alex, >>> >>> I recall you saying in another context that Firefox was interested in UIA >>> Express. The column for it was removed from Core-AAM, and is pretty sparse >>> in HTML-AAM. We need to figure out how best to document it. Most of the >>> mappings will be the same as the UIA mappings. What do you think is the best >>> way to document the places where it's different? We could add notes to the >>> UIA column where needed, or have a separate column where we copy the UIA >>> column and add the notes. I think I'd prefer to have a single column if we >>> can, because it will be easier to maintain in the spec. Do you think that >>> would work for you? We're not doing any more development on the >>> implementation in IE, so you're the main customer right now. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Cynthia >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group Issue Tracker >>> [mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org] >>> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 9:20 AM >>> To: public-aria@w3.org >>> Subject: aria-ISSUE-1015 (uia-express): Firefox interested in doing >>> UIA-Express. We may need to un-deprecate it. [ARIA 1.1 Core Mapping >>> Specification] >>> >>> aria-ISSUE-1015 (uia-express): Firefox interested in doing UIA-Express. >>> We may need to un-deprecate it. [ARIA 1.1 Core Mapping Specification] >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ARIA/track/issues/1015 >>> >>> Raised by: Cynthia Shelly >>> On product: ARIA 1.1 Core Mapping Specification >>> >>> Firefox has expressed interest in doing UIA Express. We may need to >>> un-deprecate it. If we do that, I propose we start by copying the UIA >>> column, and then making notes where there is a difference. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Monday, 15 August 2016 21:44:14 UTC