- From: Schnabel, Stefan <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:50:18 +0200
- To: Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>
- CC: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Marco Zehe <marco.zehe@googlemail.com>, James Teh <jamie@nvaccess.org>
Hi Alex, well I think offering something to be taken is better than doing nothing here. Do you know reasons why AT doesn't use these states? - Stefan -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Surkov [mailto:surkov.alexander@gmail.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 12. September 2012 08:34 To: Schnabel, Stefan Cc: Joshue O Connor; Steve Faulkner; W3C WAI-XTECH; Richard Schwerdtfeger; Marco Zehe; James Teh Subject: Re: suggest deprecating alertdialog role in ARIA 1.1 Hi, Stefan. Primarily I meant Firefox implementation but I didn't hear that these states are used by AT. Thank you. Alex. On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Schnabel, Stefan <stefan.schnabel@sap.com> wrote: > Alex, > > maps perfectly for me: > > additional" aria-dialogtype=Error/Warning/Info " -> STATE_SYSTEM_ALERT_HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW > > I remember seeing those using Inspect32 with standard windows dialogs in the states enum listed, so I don't know what you mean with " but they weren't ever implemented." > > Stefan > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexander Surkov [mailto:surkov.alexander@gmail.com] > Sent: Freitag, 7. September 2012 11:39 > To: Schnabel, Stefan > Cc: Joshue O Connor; Steve Faulkner; W3C WAI-XTECH; Richard Schwerdtfeger; Marco Zehe; James Teh > Subject: Re: suggest deprecating alertdialog role in ARIA 1.1 > > As far as I know there's no difference. MSAA has states like > STATE_SYSTEM_ALERT_LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH but they weren't ever implemented. > I don't recall anything similar in other standards. Anyway many AT > APIs are extensible so it shouldn't be a problem. > > Alex. > > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Schnabel, Stefan > <stefan.schnabel@sap.com> wrote: >> Hi Josh, Alexander >> >> good point having an additional" type=Error/Warning/Info " parameter in ARIA 1.1 for dialog. >> But then we should go overboard and declare also modality (modal/non-modal dialog). >> >> Regarding API mappings, how is the situation in Windows MSAA and let's say typed MessageBoxes ? >> Isn't there a standard way to map these additional properties without borrowing from aria-label? >> >> Regards >> Stefan >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joshue O Connor [mailto:joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie] >> Sent: Freitag, 7. September 2012 11:16 >> To: Schnabel, Stefan >> Cc: Steve Faulkner; W3C WAI-XTECH; Richard Schwerdtfeger; Marco Zehe; James Teh >> Subject: Re: suggest deprecating alertdialog role in ARIA 1.1 >> >> Hi Stefan, >> >>> It is not the fault of the ARIA spec that alertdialog is poorly supported in AT. >> >> I completely agree but devs need practical solutions right now.. not >> around the corner and to my mind anything that makes the practical >> accessible web development easier - is a good thing. >> >>> Role "alertdialog" has been invented to indicate simple ok/yes/no/cancel messageboxes in contrast to more >>> elaborated complex dialogs with role "dialog". >>> >>> Therefore, I recommend *NOT* to remove the role entirely, in contrary, it should even be extended to reflect the >>> *type* of "alert" dialog Error/Warning/Info etc. and its usage according to this should be reflected in the AP Guidelines documentation. >> >> Not a bad idea. However, I suggest removing it and actually using the >> role="dialog" as a generic role and allowing it to take the argument >> dialog Error/Warning/Info etc. >> >> Cheers >> >> Josh
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2012 06:50:53 UTC