- From: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:07:42 -0500
- To: "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Inasmuch as the HTML-WG have read our ARIA documents (now under development) and reached such a markedly different conclusion from that of the ARIA Task Force itself, it seemed possibly useful to collect the spicific URIs HTML have used to buttress their argument. I have found 9 such and provide these below. These are in alpha sort order and were collected using grep. I have not looked at how, specifically, any of them was used. However, it may be useful to look at all 9 to see what might still be contributing to misapprehension. http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#include_elements http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#mapping_additional_relations_reverse_relations http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#mapping_additional_relations_reverse_relations http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#mapping_role_table http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-practices/#Descriptions_external http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-practices/#Descriptions_tooltip http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-practices/#kbd_layout_remaining_description http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-practices/#kbd_layout_remaining_description http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria/states_and_properties#aria-describedby -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Chair, Open Accessibility janina@a11y.org Linux Foundation http://a11y.org Chair, Protocols & Formats Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/wai/pf World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 04:08:15 UTC