Re: From the HTML-WG about aria-hidden

Leif Halvard Silli writes:
> Laura Carlson, Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:55:09 -0600:
> > What about the user level? What is impacted?
> 
> At the user level, the impact is meant to lead to a richer experience. 
> E.g. instead of flattening the following link to a text string, the 
> user instead receives it as a link: 
> 
> <img src=image aria-describedby=description alt=text >
> <a id=description hidden=hidden aria-hidden=true
>    href=link >Link to long description.</a>
> 
> And according to Jonas, last week in public-html@, then whether the AT 
> would perceive the above link as link, would not depend on the AT - but 
> on the UA. If that is so, then it diminishes the possible downsides a 
> lot: The only requirement would then be that the AT supports 
> @aria-describedby. 
> 

And what about people who might want to consume the content but who do
not use AT? I seem to recall this was an important requirement of the
HTML-WG some months back, and rightfully so.


It seems to me a lot of complication is being concocted to serve a
function far more simply served by longdesc. I still suggest a shave
with Occam's Razor.

Janina

-- 

Janina Sajka,	Phone:	+1.443.300.2200
		sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net

Chair, Open Accessibility	janina@a11y.org	
Linux Foundation		http://a11y.org

Chair, Protocols & Formats
Web Accessibility Initiative	http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)

Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 02:51:12 UTC