- From: Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:10:25 -0500
- To: wai-xtech@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFBB356B4E.30515885-ON862575D3.0058B640-862575D3.0058D877@us.ibm.com>
Posted at http://www.w3.org/2009/06/12-aapi-minutes.html - DRAFT - ARIA User Agent Implementation Task Force 12 Jun 2009 See also: IRC log Attendees Present Andi_Snow_Weaver, Cynthia_Shelly, Cooper, David_Bolter, Janina Regrets Chair SV_MEETING_CHAIR Scribe Andi Contents Topics 1. Section 1.1 2. section 2 Summary of Action Items <scribe> scribe: Andi MC: Intro - if read ARIA-PRIMER, know how things work. Should at least summarize concept of ATs CS: somebody implementing this in a browser would be expected to have read WAI-ARIA spec MC: Don't want to set up something where people have to keep flipping back and forth in the specs CS: get some of the relevant information from the PRIMER ... Add more about why someone would do this - goals for user experience ... making something look more like a desktop application than a Web page Web application that is as rich as a desktop application CS: to submit text/thoughts in a bug Section 1.1 MC: first sentence - remove "and behavior" DB: DOM is just the state of the elements CS: element name describing what each thing is and the relationship between them DB: change "behavior" to "state" CS: there are names for the APIs used to manipulate the DOM DB: looking up what they are called MC: everything after the first paragraph seems too detailed for the introduction - move to its own section in the document ... previous comment was about section 1.2 ... in section 1.3, add styling information about MUSTs and SHOULDs - copy from WAI-ARIA spec CS: WAI-ARIA has no support for events and support for actions is pretty light - need to add something after the number bullets in section 1 ... browsers don't have to map to API for ATs to work - most use DOM - but to make it work like a desktop app they do ... section 1.1, last paragraph before the bulleted list, last sentence - some HTML elements have semantics built in - don't "have" to have ARIA ... separate MSAA and IA2 UIA is supported on both Windows and Linux CS: first para, add the accessible tree contains both the chrome of the user agent and the document ... sentence that talks about firing an accessible event, not sure how well that works with ARIA DB: we do do it no change change <span> example to "may not" CS: section 1.2, second bullet - change to MUST ... only SHOULDs in UAIG should correspond to SHOULDs in WAI-ARIA spec section 2 MC: shouldn't have specific references to user agents - remove references to IE CS; seems like author advice - maybe the BP doc should give that kind of information CS: number of places where there is author information - we need to examine to see if there is something relevant to UAI that we need to include MC: section 2.1, bullet 3 - remove sub-bullets from HTML spec because this may change ... summarize and then reference the HTML spec ... bullet 5 (focus and blur) - change SHOULD to MUST ... bullet 7 (:focus) seems like a WCAG compliance issue - may not need CS: may need a section on what the default style sheet should contain for ARIA add a bug for this MC: bullet 8 (keydown) - everything after first sentence is product specific CS: move into a footnote or a FAQ MC: "where appropriate" needs to be defined DB: "for any focusable element"? add a bug to figure out what we mean CS: section 2, first sentence on the first step is a little strong add a bug - need a section on activation CS: section 2.1 - what's being described as not working in HTML 4 has always worked in IE - may confuse people change to "early versions of browsers" CS: remove HTML 4 para, remove "essentially" from next paragraph, add sentence to "essentially" para that says this is not supported in older browsers and HTML4 ... remove reference to IE 5.5 ... section 2.1, bullet 2, example of platform order ... bullet 12, define activation behavior MC: section 2.2 - bullet 4a - not sure last sentence is right DB: can't really be sure which elements that are children of an element with aria-activedescendent are actually focusable CS: could be a <span> with a @tabindex on it? add a bug to work through the aria-activedescendent scenario DB: look at BP guide CS: browser needs to handle when authors have done it incorrectly MC: bullet 5 should be a MUST CS: worry about aria-activedescendent focus and how it might not be the same as desktop focus - comment for WAI-ARIA DB: web developer wants to have all keyboard handling on the container - all keypresses go to the container CS: last sentence, do we need to say anything about scrollIntoView? ... user agents "may" call scrollIntoView? DB: found that scrollIntoView is not implemented the same everywhere add to the bug that scrolling into view of focused active descendent needs to be part of the scenario MC: section 2.3 - first para - API specifics need to be called out in a table CS: goes in 3, probably in 3.5 MC; 2nd bullet - what happens if it's unsuccessful Summary of Action Items [End of minutes] Andi
Received on Friday, 12 June 2009 16:11:15 UTC