- From: Andi Snow-Weaver <andisnow@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:10:25 -0500
- To: wai-xtech@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFBB356B4E.30515885-ON862575D3.0058B640-862575D3.0058D877@us.ibm.com>
Posted at http://www.w3.org/2009/06/12-aapi-minutes.html
- DRAFT -
ARIA User Agent Implementation Task Force
12 Jun 2009
See also: IRC log
Attendees
Present
Andi_Snow_Weaver, Cynthia_Shelly, Cooper, David_Bolter, Janina
Regrets
Chair
SV_MEETING_CHAIR
Scribe
Andi
Contents
Topics
1. Section 1.1
2. section 2
Summary of Action Items
<scribe> scribe: Andi
MC: Intro - if read ARIA-PRIMER, know how things work. Should at least
summarize concept of ATs
CS: somebody implementing this in a browser would be expected to have read
WAI-ARIA spec
MC: Don't want to set up something where people have to keep flipping back
and forth in the specs
CS: get some of the relevant information from the PRIMER
... Add more about why someone would do this - goals for user experience
... making something look more like a desktop application than a Web page
Web application that is as rich as a desktop application
CS: to submit text/thoughts in a bug
Section 1.1
MC: first sentence - remove "and behavior"
DB: DOM is just the state of the elements
CS: element name describing what each thing is and the relationship between
them
DB: change "behavior" to "state"
CS: there are names for the APIs used to manipulate the DOM
DB: looking up what they are called
MC: everything after the first paragraph seems too detailed for the
introduction - move to its own section in the document
... previous comment was about section 1.2
... in section 1.3, add styling information about MUSTs and SHOULDs - copy
from WAI-ARIA spec
CS: WAI-ARIA has no support for events and support for actions is pretty
light - need to add something after the number bullets in section 1
... browsers don't have to map to API for ATs to work - most use DOM - but
to make it work like a desktop app they do
... section 1.1, last paragraph before the bulleted list, last sentence -
some HTML elements have semantics built in - don't "have" to have ARIA
... separate MSAA and IA2
UIA is supported on both Windows and Linux
CS: first para, add the accessible tree contains both the chrome of the
user agent and the document
... sentence that talks about firing an accessible event, not sure how well
that works with ARIA
DB: we do do it
no change
change <span> example to "may not"
CS: section 1.2, second bullet - change to MUST
... only SHOULDs in UAIG should correspond to SHOULDs in WAI-ARIA spec
section 2
MC: shouldn't have specific references to user agents - remove references
to IE
CS; seems like author advice - maybe the BP doc should give that kind of
information
CS: number of places where there is author information - we need to examine
to see if there is something relevant to UAI that we need to include
MC: section 2.1, bullet 3 - remove sub-bullets from HTML spec because this
may change
... summarize and then reference the HTML spec
... bullet 5 (focus and blur) - change SHOULD to MUST
... bullet 7 (:focus) seems like a WCAG compliance issue - may not need
CS: may need a section on what the default style sheet should contain for
ARIA
add a bug for this
MC: bullet 8 (keydown) - everything after first sentence is product
specific
CS: move into a footnote or a FAQ
MC: "where appropriate" needs to be defined
DB: "for any focusable element"?
add a bug to figure out what we mean
CS: section 2, first sentence on the first step is a little strong
add a bug - need a section on activation
CS: section 2.1 - what's being described as not working in HTML 4 has
always worked in IE - may confuse people
change to "early versions of browsers"
CS: remove HTML 4 para, remove "essentially" from next paragraph, add
sentence to "essentially" para that says this is not supported in older
browsers and HTML4
... remove reference to IE 5.5
... section 2.1, bullet 2, example of platform order
... bullet 12, define activation behavior
MC: section 2.2 - bullet 4a - not sure last sentence is right
DB: can't really be sure which elements that are children of an element
with aria-activedescendent are actually focusable
CS: could be a <span> with a @tabindex on it?
add a bug to work through the aria-activedescendent scenario
DB: look at BP guide
CS: browser needs to handle when authors have done it incorrectly
MC: bullet 5 should be a MUST
CS: worry about aria-activedescendent focus and how it might not be the
same as desktop focus - comment for WAI-ARIA
DB: web developer wants to have all keyboard handling on the container -
all keypresses go to the container
CS: last sentence, do we need to say anything about scrollIntoView?
... user agents "may" call scrollIntoView?
DB: found that scrollIntoView is not implemented the same everywhere
add to the bug that scrolling into view of focused active descendent needs
to be part of the scenario
MC: section 2.3 - first para - API specifics need to be called out in a
table
CS: goes in 3, probably in 3.5
MC; 2nd bullet - what happens if it's unsuccessful
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
Andi
Received on Friday, 12 June 2009 16:11:15 UTC