Re: Discussion: Accessibility Issues Procedure

On Sun, 26 Jul 2009, Shelley Powers wrote:
> Ian is fully aware of the issues, reasons, and so on. If he isn't I 
> suggest he spend time searching on @summary in these lists.

Maybe I missed an important e-mail. Could you point me to the e-mail that 
shows the reasoning and data behind the idea that including and continuing 
to encourage authors to use the summary="" attribute would improve overall 
accessibility of the Web beyond the status quo?

The position argued, in detail, with data [1] to support the current text 
in the specification is that encouraging the summary="" attribute to be 
used actually harms the overall accessibility of the Web. To my knowledge, 
nobody has provided a sound counter-argument to this. If I have missed 
such a counter-argument, please send me a link. The e-mail cited above 
includes explicit statements regarding the kind of data and explanations 
that would lead to a substantial change in the document I am editing.


Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Monday, 27 July 2009 02:54:04 UTC