- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:36:13 -0400
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, William Loughborough <wloughborough@gmail.com>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, W3C WAI-XTECH <wai-xtech@w3.org>, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Sam Ruby wrote: >> Let me enumerate a few possible ways forward. [...] >> >> Option #5 is to accept what currently is in Ian's draft. > > Option #6 is for people to actually respond to my requests for > explanations of the various proposals that people have made, so that I can > actually understand people's positions. As has been demonstrated multiple > times even with the summary="" attribute, when people make reasoned > arguments and demonstrate why their proposals are a good idea, I change > the spec to follow them. +1 - Sam Ruby
Received on Sunday, 26 July 2009 11:37:18 UTC