Re: ACTION-128: Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF

On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> For many of the other obsolete features, the basic position is that they 
> should not be used in new documents, but it may not be worth expending 
> effort to purge them from old documents. So just labeling them obsolete 
> gives enough guidance to authors and conformance checkers. But 
> summary="" is not quite like that.

In what sense is it different? I thought it was exactly like that; that's 
why I edited the spec as I did.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Wednesday, 8 July 2009 22:40:20 UTC