- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:11:01 +0000
- To: stephane.deschamps@orange-ftgroup.com
- CC: 'John Foliot' <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, 'HTML Accessibility Task Force' <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, 'W3C WAI-XTECH' <wai-xtech@w3.org>
On 09/12/2009 17:03, stephane.deschamps@orange-ftgroup.com wrote: > For what it's worth, @summary is a required attribute of the RGAA 2, the > French adaptation of WCAG2 destined to all public service web sites. Just wondering: the spirit of WCAG2 is that it's tech agnostic, and none of the techniques for, say, HTML are actually normative. Is RGAA 2 actually grabbing a subset of the techniques and making them normative? Wouldn't this risk making it obsolete very quickly, not adaptable to new better techniques/technologies, etc...just like it happened with WCAG 1? P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ______________________________________________________________
Received on Wednesday, 9 December 2009 18:11:59 UTC