- From: David Poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 07:58:43 -0500
- To: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>, "Cain, Sally" <sally.cain@rnib.org.uk>, "David Bolter" <david.bolter@utoronto.ca>, "James Nurthen" <james.nurthen@oracle.com>
- Cc: "Joseph Scheuhammer" <clown@utoronto.ca>, <wai-xtech@w3.org>, "earl johnson" <earlj.biker@gmail.com>
Hi Stefan and all, With Mac os and VoiceOver, we don't have this issue because in order to use special keys, we have to envoke them. I learned quickly after 15 years of using JAWS that this is a much better fit to reality. It is not perfect but its design allows for the browser and the site developer to provide for maximum usability where key action is concerned. So yes, in addition to many folk not knowing that there is a pass through key or how to use it, this is a usability issue. In recent versions of JAWS, it is possible to turn off "quick key navigation" if you know how and also to turn off the "virtual viewer" but the optimal solution would be for the AT to not interfere in the first place. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com> To: "David Poehlman" <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>; "Cain, Sally" <sally.cain@rnib.org.uk>; "David Bolter" <david.bolter@utoronto.ca>; "James Nurthen" <james.nurthen@oracle.com> Cc: "Joseph Scheuhammer" <clown@utoronto.ca>; <wai-xtech@w3.org>; "earl johnson" <earlj.biker@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 3:15 AM Subject: RE: [DHTML Style Guide] Tablist: Revision of Tab proposal David, Advanced Jaws users will have always advantages. It's a geek world. Sad but true. A different point is usability. I personally would hate to press every time a special key combo to cause my AT to ignore its own keys for a moment... Can anybody tell me why W3C hat not already defined as a prerequisite for web apps a bottom-up scenario for external content where the content of a (signed/trusted) business app in an UA overrides ANY UA/OS keys? That's the real problem, currently we have a top-down scenario where the lowest layer always is the OS and will always win. The first step in this direction would be a reliable keyboard hook for browser content for any hotkeys and shortcuts along with a *strong* directive by W3C what navigational keys/modifier keys/hotkeys/shortcuts to be used in web apps along with the mandatory requirement to provide an option as part of UI to make them user-configurable. I don't understand why W3C is so agnostic here and leave this job to others. Really. Industry suffers from that. - Stefan -----Original Message----- From: David Poehlman [mailto:david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com] Sent: Dienstag, 11. November 2008 14:57 To: Schnabel, Stefan; Cain, Sally; David Bolter; James Nurthen Cc: Joseph Scheuhammer; wai-xtech@w3.org; earl johnson Subject: Re: [DHTML Style Guide] Tablist: Revision of Tab proposal two comments. there is a player #4 and that is the os. As for what you can do with the AT, many will not use what is considered an advanced function of key pass through. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com> To: "Cain, Sally" <sally.cain@rnib.org.uk>; "David Bolter" <david.bolter@utoronto.ca>; "James Nurthen" <james.nurthen@oracle.com> Cc: "Joseph Scheuhammer" <clown@utoronto.ca>; <wai-xtech@w3.org>; "earl johnson" <earlj.biker@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 3:20 AM Subject: RE: [DHTML Style Guide] Tablist: Revision of Tab proposal Sally, that's exactly what our CRM Web Client allows for Shortcuts and Access Keys. But don't forget the User Agents. Their Shortcuts and Access Keys should be configurable, too. As I see it, there are 3 different players 1) Application 2) User Agent (functional + navigational keys) 3) Assistive Tech Chances are that 2) and 3) talk with each other to avoid collisions. But there may be always some of them. As a matter of last resort, Jaws for instance offers means to ignore its own keys for the next key stroke (Ins+Numpad 3 to be pressed before any application hotkey). - Stefan -----Original Message----- From: wai-xtech-request@w3.org [mailto:wai-xtech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Cain, Sally Sent: Montag, 10. November 2008 21:34 To: David Bolter; James Nurthen Cc: Joseph Scheuhammer; wai-xtech@w3.org; earl johnson Subject: RE: [DHTML Style Guide] Tablist: Revision of Tab proposal Dear all, Just a general comment on this thread. I agree with simplification of keyboard shortcuts, but there is a balance to be found here and it is *not* easy. We need to provide navigation that is accessible, predictable and simple without clashing with access technology. In a desktop application environment I recommend to developers that you provide all of the above and if there are then clashes with access technology then the *application* should provide the functionality to be flexible enough to change the keyboard shortcuts. In a web application you do not have that same flexibility and the last thing we want is a user to be constantly changing the keyboard shortcuts in their own access technology as they just won't use the web application. Thanks Sally Sally Cain Digital Accessibility Development Officer Digital Accessibility RNIB Birmingham Tel: 0121 665 4226 Email: sally.cain@rnib.org.uk -- DISCLAIMER: NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl - www.blackspider.com
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2008 12:59:26 UTC