- From: Sailesh Panchang <sailesh.panchang@deque.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 11:51:38 -0400
- To: "'Michael A Squillace'" <masquill@us.ibm.com>, <wai-xtech@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <483c2be9.4b9d220a.3811.59f2@mx.google.com>
David, WCAG 2 says: ". Sensory: If non-text content is primarily intended to create a specific sensory experience , then text alternatives at least provide descriptive identification of the non-text content." My understanding is that not all music needs to be captioned even if it there is verbal audio content. Sailesh Panchang Accessibility Services Manager (Web and Software) Deque Systems Inc. (www.deque.com) 11130 Sunrise Valley Drive, Suite #140, Reston VA 20191 Phone: 703-225-0380 (ext 105) E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com _____ From: wai-xtech-request@w3.org [mailto:wai-xtech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Michael A Squillace Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 11:20 AM To: wai-xtech@w3.org Subject: Re: Is Flickr an Edge Case? (was Re: HTML Action Item 54) Even instrumental music? What about a song that has no lyrics, a classical piece for instance? Do you plan to caption those, too? My point is that music is as inheritly audio as photographs are visual and to render them accessible to all in any way flies in the face of reasonableness. --> Mike Squillace IBM Human Ability and Accessibility Center Austin, TX W:512.823.7423 M:512.970.0066 masquill@us.ibm.com www.ibm.com/able "David Poehlman" <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com> Sent by: wai-xtech-request@w3.org 05/27/2008 09:54 AM To <wai-xtech@w3.org>, Michael A Squillace/Austin/IBM@IBMUS cc Subject Re: Is Flickr an Edge Case? (was Re: HTML Action Item 54) Yes, every verbal audio should be captioned or texted. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael A Squillace" <masquill@us.ibm.com> To: <wai-xtech@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 8:59 AM Subject: Re: Is Flickr an Edge Case? (was Re: HTML Action Item 54) Reposting as not sure msg made it through first time.... I must admit that I'm a little staggered at the amount of conversation flickr has produced with regard to alt tags. Responding, here, as a totally blind web content consumer and not as a member of the IBM Human Ability & Accessibility Center, you can put all of the alt tags on flickr that you desire - I'm still not going to visit it because photos are inheritly visual entities. For the dozen or so photos that have received thousands of views (and that, presumably, resemble the news broadcast rather than the private telephone call), 100 or 150 characters of alt text is not going to make the photo any more useful to me. Are we next going to suggest that all of the songs available on the web need closed caption so that deaf folks can enjoy them, too? As someone who is blind, I realized a long time ago that photography, driving, and painting are endeavors in which I am simply not going to engage and I think it detracts from the conversation about the real utility of alt to concentrate on what I see as, indeed, an edge case. Of course, I am only one person and I'm sure that many of my colleagues and fellow PWDs will vehemently disagree with me. --> Mike Squillace IBM Human Ability and Accessibility Center Austin, TX W:512.823.7423 M:512.970.0066 masquill@us.ibm.com www.ibm.com/able
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2008 15:43:19 UTC