- From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 13:58:10 +0100
- To: "Jon Barnett" <jonbarnett@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>, wai-liaison@w3.org, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Chris Wilson" <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>
jon, you wrote: "Then you're using the same markup for two different semantics:" not me jon, as I said, this is what the HTML5 spec says. > In which case, the author's tool, in an attempt to produce conformant > HTML how many tools actually output conformant code? regards stevef 2008/5/21 Jon Barnett <jonbarnett@gmail.com>: > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Steven Faulkner > <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: >> i suggest you read the spec, as alt="" does not only mean it is >> "purely decorative" it can also mean that the text alternative is >> supplied in the surrounding text. > > Then you're using the same markup for two different semantics: one > case where that markup means the presence of an image is irrelevant > and the image should be ignored for the document to make sense, and > another case where the presence of the image is important and must be > announced by the UA for the document to make sense. > > >> >> One thing to note is that a legend is not currently required, so would >> not conform to WCAG 2.0, which requires a text alternative for all >> images. > > It's been shown what accessibility arise from that, and we're > discussing solutions. But saying that "a text alternative is required > for all images" for accessibility because an accessibility standard > says so begs the question. > >> >>> b) An image that is vital to content (such as a gallery image) for >>> which the user simply did not provide text out of laziness: >>> >>> <img src="1100670787_6a7c664aef.jpg" ??? > >> >> that is simple, and is covered in the proposal, if the author has not >> provided a text alternative the author has produced a non conformant >> html5 document. > > In which case, the author's tool, in an attempt to produce conformant > HTML, will insert alt="" or something even more harmful. Making > something a conformance requirement won't force novice authors to > suddenly start writing good content, but it will encourage authoring > /tools/ to generate markup for the sake of conformance even if it > defeats the purpose of the conformance requirement. > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org Web Accessibility Toolbar - http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2008 12:58:48 UTC