- From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:42:34 +0100
- To: wai-xtech@w3.org, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
aloha! in reference to the Access Module's last call draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xhtml-access-20080526 which the XHTML2 WG is set to transition to CR, there has been discussion of the SVG WG's formal comments, which are logged at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html-editor/2008JulSep/0002.html and which were discussed during last week's XHTML2 telecon: http://www.w3.org/2008/07/16-xhtml-minutes.html#item02 i have been tasked by the XHTML2 WG to "bring up SVG's proposal for attribute 'order' to ascertain if affects accessibility qua accessibility" here follows the SVG WG's request for PF review: <q cite="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html- editor/2008JulSep/0002.html"> Order of @targetrole and @targetid Values: It doesn't seem intuitive that the targetrole and targetid lists are unordered, but rely solely on document order. For SVG in particular, document order is of a different nature than in XHTML; it determines the stacking order, not the sequential order. We do understand that both unordered and ordered lists have use cases; therefore, we suggest that you introduce a way for the author to control the 'tabbing' order. One way to accomplish this is to add an additional, optional attribute, such as: attribute 'order' = "document* | list" where "list" sets the tabbing order to a strict sequence determined by the order of the values in targetrole and targetid. </q> (NOTE: in the above quote, the value "document" is the default value for the proposed 'order' attribute) does this proposal raise any red, yellow or other-colored flags? it seems to me (as an individual) a reasonable and even desireable attribute, inherently increasing the accessibility of SVG, but what do others in the WAI think? gregory. -------------------------------------------------------------------- We should all be concerned about the future, because we will have to spend the rest of our lives there. -- Charles Franklin Kettering, "Seed for Thought", 1949 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory J. Rosmaita, oedipus@hicom.net Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/ Oedipus' Online Complexes: http://my.opera.com/oedipus --------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 21 July 2008 17:43:10 UTC