- From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:53:09 -0500
- To: "wai-xtech@w3.org WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Someone commented to me that "there are no IDEs for RIAs." That's Integrated Development Environments for Rich Internet Applications. The Open Ajax Accessibility discussion of authoring tools addresses checking accessibility as a bolt-on to a web IDE. http://www.openajax.org/member/wiki/Accessibility Someone else commented that "many of the people re-tooling to develop Web Applications are not Web Developers but Application Developers." I think that the second observation may reveal a blind spot in the first. Maybe the right sequence of specialization is that delivering an Application over the WebTop is a back-end switch setting in an IDE for developing interactive applications, not a root choice of a Web-dedicated IDE. At least in the context of developing interactive applications, there are lots of Integrated Development Environments. It is more than five years ago at WWW2003 that we were hearing from Philips Research about the use of task modeling in the development of interactive applications. Task modeling fosters a clear identification of "what it does (load new page)" for each step in the process, not only identified by "what does it (click on hyperlink)." http://tinyurl.com/8b7jqp Nowadays there's even an emergent CEA standard dealing with task modeling. https://www.ce.org/Standards/ANSI_CEA-2018_Final_Preview.pdf There have been IDEs offering task modeling -based design for at least that long. Maybe the strategy for how to author accessible applications on the Web should be to adopt a strong IDE and bolt on AJAX with ARIA built in. Not bolt accessibility onto a Web-peculiar or AJAX-peculiar development environment? Al
Received on Monday, 22 December 2008 17:53:50 UTC