- From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 00:49:39 -0800
- To: Aaron M Leventhal <aleventh@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: WAI XTech <wai-xtech@w3.org>, wai-xtech-request@w3.org
Received on Monday, 8 December 2008 08:50:22 UTC
But that could result in a different tab order and behavior when assistive technology is running than when it is not, or a different behavior between different types of AT with varying levels of support for aria-flowto, and it could potentially conflict with a host language feature (like nextfocus in XHTML 2). I'm still not sure this is a good idea. On Dec 8, 2008, at 12:23 AM, Aaron M Leventhal wrote: > I agree that this is wrong because it goes against the purpose of > ARIA, but I think it's just incorrectly worded. The text in the spec > should say something like "aria-flowto recommends a document reading > to assistive technologies". > > - Aaron > > > From: James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> > To: WAI XTech <wai-xtech@w3.org> > Date: 12/08/2008 08:59 AM > Subject: aria-flowto changes user-agent behavior, which isn't the > intended purpose of ARIA > > > > > aria-flowto changes user agent behavior, which isn't the intended > purpose of ARIA. > http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria/#aria-flowto > > If ARIA really needs this, we should move it to section 6.2.3 and > make it a requirement of implementing host languages. > http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria/#host_general_focus > >
Received on Monday, 8 December 2008 08:50:22 UTC