- From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 05:00:35 +0100
- To: "Chris Wilson" <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, "public html for all" <list@html4all.org>, "Al Gilman" <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org>, "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>, wai-liaison@w3.org
A few further points in regards to this matter: 1.Allowing a header to reference a td does not preclude the use of an algorithm which in the majority of cases may obviate the need for the headers attribute. It merely recognises a mechanism that can provide the required associations in cases where the algorithm cannot. 2. This issue arose from a bug post [1]. It was escalated to the Chairs of the HTML WG by the editor "Reassigning to Mike for arbitration." [2] It has been decided by Chris Wilson as Chair that a header should be allowed to reference a td. So the question is whether the editor will abide by an arbitration process that he invoked, or because he disagrees with the decision choose to ignore it? He has recognised the authority of the chairs to override his authority: "Sure, so long as I am editor, the chairs have the authority (and responsibility) to override me if I make mistakes." [3] In the case of @headers it would seem that the Chairs have decided the editor has made a mistake in not allowing it. But it appears to despite the editor sending the issue to arbitration and publicly stating that the chairs have authority over what goes into the spec. The editor will now ignore the result of the process he himself set in motion: "<Hixie> fwiw my plan with this tables stuff is to do exactly what i was going to do anyway, which is to get to it when i get to it, and when i get to it, read all the arguments and research, and come to a conclusion based on that" [4] [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5822 [2] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5822#c14 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2008Aug/0599.html [4] http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20080829#l-1284 regards stevef
Received on Sunday, 31 August 2008 04:01:11 UTC