Boris Zbarsky wrote: > I assume you mean "precedent". That is a rather rude observation, Boris : if (as I believe) David is unable to see what he types, his speech synthesiser may well render "president" as aurally indistinguishable from "precedent". > [A]ll authors [1] must be forced (whether by civil laws or by authoring specifications) to produce only content that is accessible to all users [2]. No, not "forced". "Required", "expected", whatever. The specification must be expressed in terms of accessible content : if a user (author) elects to ignore the specification, and produce inaccessible material, then no-one is planning to "force" that user to do otherwise, unless he/she is producing material that is covered by national or international accessibility legislation. Philip TAYLORReceived on Sunday, 24 August 2008 15:13:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 20 January 2023 19:58:30 UTC